NSW Government Accessibility Intelligence
A strategic snapshot of digital accessibility across 15 NSW Government agencies, grouped by cluster. Indicative WCAG 2.1 AA risk scores, common issue patterns, and priority remediation focus.
How to read these numbers. Scores are indicative, derived from automated WCAG 2.1 AA scans of public homepages and selected high-traffic pages for each agency, snapshotted in November 2025. Automated testing finds about 30 to 40 per cent of WCAG issues. Manual and assistive-technology testing typically uncovers more. Treat scores as a directional signal of risk, not a final compliance verdict. A full audit is the only reliable way to confirm conformance.
How accessible are NSW Government digital services?
Across the 15 NSW agencies sampled, indicative WCAG 2.1 AA scores average 63.2 out of 100, with four agencies in the high-risk band and one (Digital NSW) leading the field at 86.2. The most common issues are colour contrast, missing image alt text, and unclear link names, present across every agency tested. Planning Portal, NCAT, icare NSW and Courts & Tribunals show the highest concentration of critical and high-severity barriers.
Risk distribution
Cluster performance
Most common accessibility issues
| Agency | Cluster | Score | Risk | Critical | High | Priority | Remediation scope |
|---|
Select any row for the dimension breakdown. Remediation scope is an indicative effort band based on issue count and severity, not a quote. Request a scoped estimate.
Issue prevalence across agencies
Counts are aggregate instances detected across the 15 agencies sampled. Use the WCAG Criteria Search to identify the success criterion behind each issue.
WCAG 2.1 principle breakdown
Perceivable
- Colour contrast
- Image alt text
- Video captions
Operable
- Keyboard access
- Link names
- Button names
Understandable
- Form labels
- Error messages
- Language tags
Robust
- ARIA roles
- Valid HTML
- Name, role, value